Archetypal Criticism

I'm writing this blog as a part of thinking activity assigned by our professor Dr. Dilip Barad sir, in this blog I'll delve into the Archetypal criticism and by discussing some of the questions I'll try to make the concept more clear.

What is Archetypal Criticism?

Archetypal criticism delves into the depths of stories, digging up the recurring patterns and universal symbols that repeat across cultures and time periods. It seeks to understand how literature taps into our shared "collective unconscious," a concept proposed by psychologist Carl Jung.

Imagine a vast variety woven with threads of myths, legends, and recurring themes like the hero's journey, the battle between good and evil, or the forbidden fruit. Archetypal criticism helps us identify these threads in individual literary works, revealing how they contribute to the story's meaning and impact on readers. 

Archetypes are recurring patterns of characters, symbols, and situations that appear across cultures and literary works. Examples include the hero, the fraudster, the wise old mentor, the arden, the journey, and the battle. The Jungian concept proposes that beneath our individual consciousness lies a shared repository of universal memories and experiences, available through myths and dreams. Archetypes are seen as manifestations of this shared unconscious.

Archetypal critics pay close attention to the symbolic meaning of characters, objects, and events within a literary work. They believe that these symbols tap into the collective unconscious and convey deeper meaning beyond the literal surface. It helps us understand how literature speaks to our shared human experiences and emotions, fostering connection and empathy across cultures.

Enriches Interpretation: It provides a lens to analyze literary works with greater depth, uncovering layers of meaning hidden beneath the surface plot.

It shows how contemporary literature echoes and reinterprets ancient myths and archetypes, highlighting the continuity of storytelling across time. Archetypal criticism is not about reducing literature to a set of fixed formulas. It's a tool for exploration, encouraging us to appreciate the depth and richness of stories by recognizing the universal threads that weave them together.

Archetypal Critics and their works:- 

Decoding Universal Patterns in Literature

Archetypal critics delve into the depths of literature, searching for recurring patterns and symbols that echo across cultures and throughout human history. They believe these "archetypes" - universal characters, themes, and images - tap into a shared collective unconscious, shaping and resonating with readers regardless of their individual backgrounds.

Carl Jung: While not a literary critic himself, Jung's concept of the collective unconscious laid the foundation for archetypal criticism. His works like "Symbols and Life" and "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" provided the framework for understanding archetypes as universal symbols.

Northrop Frye: A Canadian literary critic, Frye explored archetypes in great depth in his book "Anatomy of Criticism." He categorized archetypes into genres like comedy, tragedy, and romance, and analyzed how they interact within literary works.

Maud Bodkin: One of the earliest proponents of archetypal criticism, Bodkin focused on the emotional dimensions of archetypes in her book "Archetypal Patterns in Poetry." She examined how archetypes evoke fundamental human experiences like joy, sorrow, and fear.

Joseph Campbell: Known for his book "The Hero with a Thousand Faces," Campbell explored the hero archetype across various cultures and myths. He showed how the hero's journey, with its trials and triumphs, resonates with our own individual struggles and aspirations.

Remember, archetypal criticism is not about reducing a text to a fixed set of meanings. It's about recognizing the deeper patterns and connections that resonate with readers on a universal level. By understanding how archetypes function, we can gain a richer appreciation for the power of literature to connect us to our shared human experience.

Inductive method with an illustration of Shakespeare's Hamlet's Grave Diggers scene:-

The inductive method in literature involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations within a text. It works by analyzing individual details, patterns, and recurring elements to understand a broader theme, significance, or message. 

Here's how it applies to the iconic Grave Digger scene in Shakespeare's Hamlet:

The Gravediggers joking about death, skulls, and decomposition, using earthy humor and dark jokes. They discuss Yorick, a court jester known for his wit and laughter, now reduced to mere bone. Hamlet's philosophical musings on mortality and the shortness of life intertwine with the gravediggers' simple acceptance of death.

The scene confronts the harsh reality of death, highlighting its universality and leveling effect, irrespective of social status (Yorick being a prime example). Hamlet's intellectual contemplation of death clashes with the gravediggers' pragmatic acceptance, raising questions about how individuals grapple with mortality. The scene serves as a stark reminder of our own mortality, urging us to appreciate life and its value.

Focusing on a specific detail like Yorick's skull, the gravedigger remarks, "Now, where be your jibes now? your gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar?" This observation, though specific to Yorick, leads to a general conclusion about life's fleeting nature and the inevitable loss of earthly pleasures. Hamlet's subsequent meditation on the skull further expands on this theme, drawing broader connections to human existence and the meaning of the life.

Deductive method with reference to an analogy to music, painting, rhythm and patterns:-

The deductive method, in my view, resembles a complex musical composition played out on the canvas of logic. For example a coherence where the opening theme, a universal law or principle, sets the tone. This theme unfolds through intricate melodies, representing specific theories derived from the law. Every note follows the established key, ensuring internal consistency. The percussion of observation and experimentation provides the rhythm, testing each note and tightening the structure. Finally, the grand finale, the conclusion, emerges as a harmonious resolution of the musical puzzle.

Iillustrating with examples:

Painting a Portrait:

Law of  All objects with mass cast gravitational shadows. Theories of This specific object has mass. In Rhythm we observe a shadow under the object. Therefore, the object has mass.

Composing a Rhythm:

In Western music, we can see every measure in 4/4 time must have four quarter-note beats.

The phrase of theory starts with an eighth note followed by a dotted quarter note. In Rhythm we count the remaining beats in the measure. The phrase must end with two eighth notes to complete the four-beat measure.

Discovering a Pattern:

While looking as the law in Fibonacci sequence, each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers. In theory The first two numbers in a sequence are 1 and 1. While observing we calculate subsequent numbers by adding the previous two. The sequence follows the Fibonacci pattern.

Conclusion:-

Each example demonstrates the deductive method's strength in reaching certain and undeniable conclusions. Like a well-crafted piece of music, the structure is airtight, leaving no room for doubt. However, its limitations lie in its dependence on pre-existing laws and accurate observations. Just as a disharmonious chord can disrupt the music, false premises or faulty observations can lead to misleading conclusions.

Here I'm sharing one vidoe of our professor in which it is explained in detail.

Hope the above information would help to reach the thurst of your search🌻.

Words: 1,169

Image: 2

Video: 1